What did we expect would happen to the anchor who told convicted felon Michael Avenatti in 2018 he "hit a lot of the right notes" when he tested the electoral waters in Iowa? Democrats " would be foolish to underestimate” him, Wallace said. What did we expect would happen to the anchor who told failed 2020 Democratic primary candidate Beto O’Rourke that it is “clear” he had “that thing that not all politicians have”? Elizabeth Warren failed to capture even a single delegate in the 2020 New Hampshire primary, declared the Massachusetts lawmaker a masterful campaigner for her willingness to take photos with supporters? I mean, how long could the viewership boost have lasted for the same anchor who, after Democratic Sen. And now that Trump is gone, so are her ratings. Chucking out anti-Trump red meat is about the only thing Wallace has ever been good at. It is on-brand for the woman who bought her way back into elite society by hawking insider gossip regarding the time she served as an adviser to Sarah Palin’s failed vice presidential campaign. But it is completely on-brand for a network television burnout. This analysis isn't insightful, bold, or intelligent. It goes on for another six tweets, the cable host unironically comparing the supposed indignities “suffered” by Comey and McCabe to the horrors of the Holocaust. “Then he came to ,” she continued, “and I said nothing because there was this inspector general report that said McCabe lacked candor.” “And I said nothing because I was mad at Comey because of the Clinton email investigation and blamed him for Trump's election." “First he came for ," Wallace said, reciting word-for-word Wittes' bizarre and, frankly, offensive screed, which is just a lazy and inartful rip-off of the old quote about inaction in the face of evil. Spoiler alert: The tweet thread does not, in fact, "make you think." The author of the tweets, the Brookings Institution’s Benjamin Wittes, “goes there,” Wallace assured her audience, “putting the acts of revenge we’re seeing from Donald Trump in a provocative historical frame that you may or may not agree with, but it will make you think.” intelligence officials to the slaughter of six million Jews. Remember, Wallace is the same wonder-brain who, in February 2020, recited a series of tweets comparing the firing of career U.S. And make no mistake, few on cable television opposed Trump in a more laughable, ludicrous, and audacious manner than Wallace. She tied her success directly to Trump, and now she is living with the consequences of having centered her program entirely around opposing the former president. The collapse couldn’t have happened to a more deserving anchor. Senate, but now? Who needs analysis from a know-nothing, washed-up GOP operative? Very few people, apparently. Wallace’s particularly ignorant brand of analysis and her unrelenting cheerleading for the Democratic Party may have served their purpose when the Republican Party held the White House and the U.S. It was only a matter of time before lousy ratings caught up to cable news’ patron saint of mediocrity. In contrast, her program, which launched in 2017, averaged 543,000 viewers in the 25-54 demographic in January, 297,000 in February, 177,000 in March, and 215,000 in April. In May, just a little over 147,000 people in this all-important demo tuned in every day to watch Wallace's two-hour MSNBC program. MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace has suffered a roughly 80% decline in viewership in the 25-54 age demographic since President Donald Trump left office, the Washington Free Beacon reports, citing data provided by the Nielsen Media Research. “ Resistance” television has been having a rough go of it lately.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |